IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ifs/fistud/v1y1980i3p29-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Change the Financial Year

Author

Listed:
  • C Johnson

Abstract

This paper argues that the UK financial year (FY) should be moved from April-April to coincide with the calendar year (CY). A proposal to this effect was examined by a Select Committee on Procedure of the House of Commons in 1968. The Select Committee did not reach any decision on it. They published a 1965 Treasury Memorandum on the pros and cons. They heard evidence by Mr. Diamond, the then Chief Secretary of the Treasury, that no such change could be contemplated until 1972 at the earliest, in view of the decimalization of the currency scheduled for 1971. "At this stage the Government would certainly not wish to be involved in dealing with a problem of which, even if ultimately it were to be achieved, the transitional difficulties are very great indeed and involved very considerable additional manpower and problems of collecting tax and so on. The question you have raised of decimalization is merely relevant in the sense that any alteration of this kind must be regarded as for some period ahead, and as decimalization is due in 1971, it will be most unlikely tht one could cope with the re-organisation that would be involved before 1971. One would then have decimalization and therefore a new proposal for alternation would in any even, I should have thought, be incapable of being carried out until 1972 or so at the earliest." The Treasury gave arguments in favour of as well as against the change. But the short-run difficulties outweighed the loner-run advatages. The proposal has been effectively buried for over a decade.

Suggested Citation

  • C Johnson, 1980. "Change the Financial Year," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 1(3), pages 29-33, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ifs:fistud:v:1:y:1980:i:3:p:29-33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ifs:fistud:v:1:y:1980:i:3:p:29-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emma Hyman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifsssuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.