IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ifs/fistud/v12y1991i3p16-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adult equivalence scales: a life-cycle perspective

Author

Listed:
  • James Banks

    (Institute for Fiscal Studies and University College London)

  • Richard Blundell

    (Institute for Fiscal Studies and University College London)

  • Ian Preston

    (Institute for Fiscal Studies and University College London)

Abstract

In any policy-orientated study of family welfare, it is inevitable that some comparison of welfare between households with different compositions will be required, and the theory of (adult) equivalence scales aims to formalise the way in which these comparisons may be made. An adult equivalence scale is defined as the proportionate increase in income per adult necessary to maintain a certain level of household living standard given some change in demographic circumstances (typically, the introduction of children). Values for such scales might be obtained in any of a number of ways. It is clear, for instance, that any national social security system can be interpreted as embodying one such set of scales; in the UK this is given by those reported in Table 1.

Suggested Citation

  • James Banks & Richard Blundell & Ian Preston, 1991. "Adult equivalence scales: a life-cycle perspective," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 12(3), pages 16-29, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:ifs:fistud:v:12:y:1991:i:3:p:16-29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bruce Bradbury, 2003. "The welfare interpretation of consumer equivalence scales," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(7), pages 770-787, July.
    2. Ian Gibbs & Peter Kemp, 1993. "Housing Benefit and Income Redistribution," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 30(1), pages 63-72, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ifs:fistud:v:12:y:1991:i:3:p:16-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emma Hyman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifsssuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.