IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injmfa/v5y2013i1p33-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Card bases payment mode - an accounting perspective: a comparison between credit card and debit card payment systems in India

Author

Listed:
  • Leena Bhatia
  • Bindu Jain

Abstract

When commerce goes electronic, the means of paying for goods and services must also go electronic. Thus, for electronic commerce it is also necessary to change payment mode from physical to logical. Many businesses accept payment by card for their goods and services and this can undoubtedly offer some distinct advantages as far as accounting and business is concerned. After considering the advantages we should know how other people think of it. So in this study, we conducted a survey to know how an ordinary Indian customer feels about electronic payment so that business houses can make changes in their accounting system to incorporate the customers' choice. Studies show that followed by the slowdown, Indians continued to spend online in the last quarter of 2008 to emerge as the third highest spenders on the internet in the Asia Pacific region. During the present study, it has been observed that the credit card and debit card payment systems are more common as compared to other modes of electronic payments. Thus in this paper, we are presenting complete information on the credit card and debit card payments and transactions in the last five years and until November 2010 in India.

Suggested Citation

  • Leena Bhatia & Bindu Jain, 2013. "Card bases payment mode - an accounting perspective: a comparison between credit card and debit card payment systems in India," International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1), pages 33-44.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injmfa:v:5:y:2013:i:1:p:33-44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=52408
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injmfa:v:5:y:2013:i:1:p:33-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=252 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.