IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injmfa/v4y2012i2p105-124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do managers use securitisation gains for real manipulation purposes?

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Chakib Kolsi
  • Hamadi Matoussi

Abstract

Recent corporate financial scandals show that managers, capital market intermediaries and financial statement users are unable to assess correctly the information disclosed by firms related to unconsolidated special purpose entities and securitisation transactions. In this paper, we present empirical evidence on the use of securitisation gains by firms for real manipulation of reported earnings. First, the estimation of the Heckman (1979) two-step selection model shows that securitisation gain is related to financial reporting determinants (leverage), economic determinants (free cash-flow and interest coverage ratio) corporate governance determinants (percent of shares owned by the CEO) and other control variables (firm sector and return on equity). Second, the estimation of the simultaneous equation approach using the seemingly unrelated regression (SURE) method (Zellner, 1962) shows that managers use discretionary accruals and securitisation gains as substitutes to manage their reported earnings. Additional analysis shows that securitization gains are used for real smoothing purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Chakib Kolsi & Hamadi Matoussi, 2012. "Do managers use securitisation gains for real manipulation purposes?," International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(2), pages 105-124.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injmfa:v:4:y:2012:i:2:p:105-124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=46421
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injmfa:v:4:y:2012:i:2:p:105-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=252 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.