IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injmfa/v3y2011i2p140-169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An empirical study of the use and usefulness of financial, non-financial and subjective measures for performance evaluation in industrial companies in Bahrain

Author

Listed:
  • P.L. Joshi
  • Rajesh Kumar
  • Jasim Al-Ajmi

Abstract

This study uses survey data from 47 industrial companies located in the Kingdom of Bahrain in order to examine to the extent to which the companies combine the use of financial, non-financial and subjective measures in evaluating their performance. The survey reports that, although ROI is the most popular financial measure, industrial companies use an integration of financial and non-financial measures. Firm size also influences the use of these measures and significant differences were observed among the large and medium size firms with respect to operations-related measures. With the exception of ROI in a few cases, the use of performance measures was not found to be significantly different between industries. However, significant differences are found in the use of measures, particularly in financial and non-financial measures, when the data is analysed by line of business (by number of divisions). Furthermore, the study indicates that the various types of measures have different impacts on important employee actions, such as 'contribute to the quality of the short-term operational decisions', 'contribute to the quality of the long-term strategic decisions', 'encourage gamesmanship or manipulation', 'encourage innovation' and 'provide focus on the goals of the departments in the firm'.

Suggested Citation

  • P.L. Joshi & Rajesh Kumar & Jasim Al-Ajmi, 2011. "An empirical study of the use and usefulness of financial, non-financial and subjective measures for performance evaluation in industrial companies in Bahrain," International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(2), pages 140-169.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injmfa:v:3:y:2011:i:2:p:140-169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=39494
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Danilo Gambelli & Francesco Solfanelli & Stefano Orsini & Raffaele Zanoli, 2021. "Measuring the Economic Performance of Small Ruminant Farms Using Balanced Scorecard and Importance-Performance Analysis: A European Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injmfa:v:3:y:2011:i:2:p:140-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=252 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.