IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injmfa/v1y2008i1p6-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An examination of the types of cost system used to obtain product costs in British manufacturing industry

Author

Listed:
  • John A. Brierley
  • Christopher J. Cowton
  • Colin Drury

Abstract

Kaplan has argued that a single accounting system should not be used to calculate product costs for use in decision making because it is not possible for a single system to satisfy the three different purposes of costs systems. Instead, he has suggested that operating units should use three separate systems to satisfy each of the three purposes or a database system from which information can be extracted to satisfy each purpose. This paper uses the results of 259 useable questionnaire responses and 55 interviews with British management accountants to examine which types of cost system are used to obtain product costs in British manufacturing industry and why these cost systems are used. The results reveal that single, separate and database systems are used to obtain product costs, with single systems being the most popular. Single systems are used for historical reasons and appear heavily institutionalised in British manufacturing industry. Although separate and database system are used they are not significantly different from single systems. The implication of this is that costs calculated using these two types of system might not satisfy the three different purposes of cost systems.

Suggested Citation

  • John A. Brierley & Christopher J. Cowton & Colin Drury, 2008. "An examination of the types of cost system used to obtain product costs in British manufacturing industry," International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 6-17.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:injmfa:v:1:y:2008:i:1:p:6-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=20458
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injmfa:v:1:y:2008:i:1:p:6-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=252 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.