IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injmfa/v15y2023i3p346-371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Board gender diversity and firm risk-taking: the moderating role of board size

Author

Listed:
  • Hussain Muhammad
  • Stefania Migliori

Abstract

This paper provides new insights into the relationship between board gender diversity and firm risk-taking by examining whether board size (BS) alters the influence of gender diversity on firm risk-taking. This study employs a quantitative method with a sample of 192 non-financial listed firms in Italy from 2016 to 2020. Based on our results, board gender diversity does not exert a consistent influence on firm risk-taking. Instead, its effect is contingent upon BS. Given that larger and smaller boards differ in building and employing their strategic decisions, we find that smaller boards are willing to ratify risky policy choices aligned with the shareholder's interest. Notwithstanding, we failed to find any significant gender diversity's effect on risk-taking in firms with smaller boards. On the other hand, larger boards are found to be less discrete and more inclined to form middle-ground, moderate, and safe decisions to reduce firm risk-taking. Our results reveal that larger boards accentuate the risk reduction effect of gender diversity, showing that Italian non-financial firms are better off with larger and gender-diverse boards. Larger boards with more female members enhance problem-solving and market insights, facilitate adherence to the government or regulatory policies and help reduce the firm's risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Hussain Muhammad & Stefania Migliori, 2023. "Board gender diversity and firm risk-taking: the moderating role of board size," International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(3), pages 346-371.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:injmfa:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:346-371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=131738
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injmfa:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:346-371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=252 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.