IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injmfa/v13y2021i2p110-132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Voluntary risk disclosure and values of FTSE350 firms: the role of an industry-based litigation risk

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Hassanein
  • Nader Elsayed

Abstract

There is conflicting research on whether litigation risk affects voluntary disclosure positively or negatively. This study thus aims to examine how litigation risk affects the voluntary disclosure of risk information. It also explores whether litigation risk influences the extent to which voluntary risk disclosure is value relevant. The paper utilises a sample from UK FTSE350 firms, the computerised textual analysis is employed to measure the voluntary risk disclosure level, and empirical analyses are estimated using OLS and fixed-effect regressions. The study finds that voluntary risk disclosure in the UK is a positive function of litigation risk. Likewise, investors react positively to voluntary risk information, leading to enhanced UK corporate values. However, this nexus is more substantial in firms facing higher litigation risk. The further analysis supports the view that firms facing high (low) litigation risk voluntarily disclose more (less) relevant risk information. Our findings encourage FTSE350 firms to increase the magnitude of voluntary risk information, whether a firm is facing a high or low level of litigation risk, and the policymakers to issue further rules regulating the disclosure of voluntary risk information. Likewise, the study provides relevant implications for the protection of investors in the UK.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Hassanein & Nader Elsayed, 2021. "Voluntary risk disclosure and values of FTSE350 firms: the role of an industry-based litigation risk," International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(2), pages 110-132.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injmfa:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:110-132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=117768
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hassanein, Ahmed, 2022. "Risk reporting and stock return in the UK: Does market competition Matter?," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    2. Ahmed Hassanein & Ahmed Bani-Mustafa & Khalil Nimer, 2024. "A country’s culture and reporting of sustainability practices in energy industries: does a corporate sustainability committee matter?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Ahmed Hassanein & Jamal Ali Al-Khasawneh & Hany Elzahar, 2022. "R&D expenditure and managerial ownership: evidence from firms of high-vs-low R&D intensity," Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(3), pages 654-672, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injmfa:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:110-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=252 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.