IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injmfa/v12y2020i1p1-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The determinants of XBRL adoption: a meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Mohssen El Ansary
  • Mourad Oubrich
  • Beatrice Orlando
  • Fabio Fiano

Abstract

eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) is a new technology revolutionising the world of business information. Past studies attempt explaining what are the factors, such as drivers and inhibitors, able to exert influence over the adoption of this technology. To date, findings seem contrasting. This fragmented panorama provides the opportunity to current study, which purpose is to provide a fine-tuned meta-analysis of determinants of XBRL adoption, by cross-checking the results of 18 prior contributions. Originally, we group determinants of XBRL adoption into three main species of factors: the perceived usability related to the technical dimension (perceived ease-of-use and perceived usefulness - technology acceptance model). The second dimension includes environmental factors (normative pressure). The third dimension is formed by the organisational aspect, composed by the managerial attitude and organisational expertise. The output of this study is an original conceptual framework that we will test in the Moroccan context.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohssen El Ansary & Mourad Oubrich & Beatrice Orlando & Fabio Fiano, 2020. "The determinants of XBRL adoption: a meta-analysis," International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:injmfa:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:1-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=106999
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injmfa:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:1-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=252 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.