IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injleg/v3y2011i4p234-267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study of efficiency trends and productivity changes in the US TL carriers: 2000-2009

Author

Listed:
  • Dinesh R. Pai

Abstract

In this study, the nature and extent of efficiency and productivity growth in the US truckload (TL) carriers is investigated using non-parametric techniques. To analyse efficiency trends, a DEA window analysis is conducted on publicly available financial data with a representative sample of ten publicly listed TL carriers for the period 2000 to 2009. Malmquist index is used to study the productivity changes in the US TL carriers. The window analysis results reveal that the average overall efficiencies of the TL carriers are relatively low. They do not show a definite trend, but tend to follow the general economic conditions prevalent during the study period. Furthermore, a majority of the carriers are scale inefficient, which demonstrates that the TL carriers are not operating at their optimal size. Malmquist results, calculated from the DEA results, allows productivity changes to be decomposed into two categories: technical efficiency changes, and technological changes. The results reveal that in general the productivity of the TL carriers has decreased mainly due to the technological regression.

Suggested Citation

  • Dinesh R. Pai, 2011. "Study of efficiency trends and productivity changes in the US TL carriers: 2000-2009," International Journal of Logistics Economics and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(4), pages 234-267.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:injleg:v:3:y:2011:i:4:p:234-267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44962
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injleg:v:3:y:2011:i:4:p:234-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=64 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.