IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injdan/v9y2017i3p189-206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using graphical techniques from discriminant analysis to understand and interpret cluster solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Courtney McKim
  • James A. Bovaird
  • Chaorong Wu

Abstract

Clustering is a common form of exploratory analysis in the social and behavioural sciences and education. There are many clustering algorithms available to researchers and each algorithm assigns membership slightly different. This paper compares five classification algorithms (SPSS' TwoStep, k-means, hierarchical (nearest and furthest neighbour), and finite mixture model. The results show the highest agreement among the finite mixture model and the two-step clustering algorithm, as well as k-means and two-step. Hierarchical (nearest neighbour) does not have high agreement with k-means and the mixture model. Once a research decides on a clustering algorithm they often have a hard time interpreting clusters once a solution is reached. This study suggests using discriminant analysis as a method of interpreting cluster solutions which also allows researchers to visually see the interpretation and also provides the number of functions and which measures load on which function allowing more information about the clusters.

Suggested Citation

  • Courtney McKim & James A. Bovaird & Chaorong Wu, 2017. "Using graphical techniques from discriminant analysis to understand and interpret cluster solutions," International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(3), pages 189-206.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:injdan:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:189-206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=86633
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injdan:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:189-206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=282 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.