IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injdan/v7y2015i2p203-215.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multicriteria analysis of e-learning courses

Author

Listed:
  • Ioannis Petasakis
  • Theodosios Theodosiou
  • Ioannis Kazanidis
  • Stavros Valsamidis

Abstract

In this paper, the multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method weighted sum model (WSM) is applied in order to evaluate online courses uploaded in the learning management system (LMS) of the Department of Accountancy of Kavala's Institute of Technology. The linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test are also applied to analyse the LMS data. Seven factors are used, namely, the four-criteria TAM, quality, quantity and utilisation of e-learning platform utilities and three other attribures i.e., year of study, type of course and the mean grade at the exams. The evaluation process took place in three distinct phases. In the first phase the weights of the aforementioned first four criteria were estimated. At the second phase the students evaluated the online courses. The courses were indexed with the use of the WSM and were assigned a ranking score. After the second phase, the educators were informed about the indexing results. Most of them tried to improve their courses in terms of educational material. Two months later, the evaluation process was repeated and most of the scores were higher than the corresponding ones of the former phase. The results of both phases indicate that the TAM group criterion is considered as the most important one, whereas the utilisation as the least important.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioannis Petasakis & Theodosios Theodosiou & Ioannis Kazanidis & Stavros Valsamidis, 2015. "Multicriteria analysis of e-learning courses," International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 203-215.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injdan:v:7:y:2015:i:2:p:203-215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=68751
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injdan:v:7:y:2015:i:2:p:203-215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=282 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.