IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injdan/v1y2009i3p275-296.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A framework to arrive at a unique performance measurement score for the balanced scorecard

Author

Listed:
  • M. Punniyamoorthy
  • R. Murali

Abstract

For any business activity, it is essential to identify the required performance measures which have strategic implications. The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is a very useful performance measurement system. But there is no distinction made with regard to the importance provided to the perspectives under BSC. Furthermore, for some metrics, the actual performance may be greater than the targeted performance and for some, it is less. This makes it unclear for decision makers whether the firm had achieved the strategic intent in totality or not. In this article, the weightages for the perspectives and subcriteria are arrived at through the fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and an analytical expression developed by the author. This model further helps in arriving at a unified score to portray the overall performance of the organisation. The developed model is validated through a real-life example.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Punniyamoorthy & R. Murali, 2009. "A framework to arrive at a unique performance measurement score for the balanced scorecard," International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(3), pages 275-296.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:injdan:v:1:y:2009:i:3:p:275-296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=24296
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injdan:v:1:y:2009:i:3:p:275-296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=282 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.