IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injdan/v18y2026i2p107-132.html

Better credit decisioning through scorecard surrogate models for machine learning algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Billie Anderson
  • Naeem Siddiqi
  • Mark A. Newman
  • J. Michael Hardin

Abstract

Over the last several years, the application of machine-learning models, called black-box models, has become a popular research topic in credit scoring. This study illustrates how surrogate models can be used to interpret credit decisions made using black-box models. A framework for using surrogate models in a credit scoring context is used to explain and interpret well-known machine learning models (e.g., neural networks, forests, gradient boosting, and support vector machines). This study uses real-world anonymised consumer bureau data obtained from Equifax to illustrate the degree of interpretability that can be achieved using machine learning models to assess the creditworthiness of loan applicants. The main objective of this study is to show practitioners how surrogate scorecard models can be used to interpret some of the most popular machine learning models in a credit scoring decision making process.

Suggested Citation

  • Billie Anderson & Naeem Siddiqi & Mark A. Newman & J. Michael Hardin, 2026. "Better credit decisioning through scorecard surrogate models for machine learning algorithms," International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(2), pages 107-132.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injdan:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:107-132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=154787
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injdan:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:107-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=282 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.