IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injdan/v17y2025i3p238-253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An empirical examination of classification algorithms and resampling strategies for dealing with imbalanced datasets: a comparative analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Himani S. Deshpande
  • Leena Ragha

Abstract

Imbalanced datasets can lead to biased models and inaccurate predictions, thus making it a crucial issue to be addressed. This research comprehensively analyses issues, approaches and evaluation parameters to work with imbalanced dataset based machine learning models. Literature suggests that data imbalance handling methods are categorised into three broad categories namely pre-processing methods, cost-sensitive learning, and ensemble methods. Experiments are conducted to test popular classifiers in combination with three pre-processing methods namely clustered smote, random over sampling, and scaled values on seven standard imbalanced datasets. The results of study show that Random Forest classifier with Random Over Sampling pre-processing method, performed best for most of the datasets with precision values between 0.68 to 1, AUC values between 0.83-1, and prediction accuracy between 76.1-99.8%. This study highlights that the choice of the evaluation metric and the pre-processing method can have a significant impact on the performance of the classifier.

Suggested Citation

  • Himani S. Deshpande & Leena Ragha, 2025. "An empirical examination of classification algorithms and resampling strategies for dealing with imbalanced datasets: a comparative analysis," International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(3), pages 238-253.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injdan:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:238-253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=148563
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injdan:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:238-253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=282 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.