IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injdan/v16y2024i1p32-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of machine learning's performance in stock market prediction, compared to traditional technical analysis indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Bouasabah

Abstract

This study compares the performance of machine learning (ML) algorithms with traditional technical indicators in real estate, technology, and healthcare sectors. Unveiling the limitations of classical indicators, particularly their struggle to surpass the 50% threshold, the research explores the predictive capabilities of ML algorithms, focusing on AdaBoost and support vector machine (SVM). The relative strength index (RSI) emerges as a reliable performer for buy decisions but with potential oversight. Results affirm the superiority of ML algorithms in precision, recall, and F1 score, transcending traditional indicators. Sector-specific variations showcase exceptional ML efficacy, particularly in healthcare. Algorithmic evaluation spotlights AdaBoost and SVM, underscoring the importance of strategic selection. The study advocates for a nuanced approach, blending RSI with ML for refined strategies. In conclusion, this research contributes significantly to financial decision-making, exposing limitations and positioning ML algorithms as powerful tools for improved investment strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Bouasabah, 2024. "Analysis of machine learning's performance in stock market prediction, compared to traditional technical analysis indicators," International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(1), pages 32-46.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injdan:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:32-46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=137465
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injdan:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:32-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=282 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.