IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injdan/v13y2021i1-2p72-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating information criteria in latent class analysis: application to identify classes of breast cancer dataset

Author

Listed:
  • Abdallah Abarda
  • Mohamed Dakkon
  • Khawla Asmi
  • Youssef Bentaleb

Abstract

In recent studies, latent class analysis (LCA) modelling has been proposed as a convenient alternative to standard classification methods. It has become a popular tool for clustering respondents into homogeneous subgroups based on their responses on a set of categorical variables. The absence of a common accepted statistical indicator for deciding the number of classes in the study of population represents one of the major unresolved issues in the application of the LCA. Determining the number of classes constituting the profiles of a given population is often done by using the likelihood ratio test, however the use of such methodology is not correct theoretically. To overcome this problem, we propose an alternative for the classical latent class models selection methods based on the information criteria. This article aims to investigate the performance of information criteria for selecting the latent class analysis models. Nine information criteria are compared under various sample sizes and model dimensionality. We propose also an application of ICs to select the best model of breast cancer dataset.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdallah Abarda & Mohamed Dakkon & Khawla Asmi & Youssef Bentaleb, 2021. "Evaluating information criteria in latent class analysis: application to identify classes of breast cancer dataset," International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(1/2), pages 72-87.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injdan:v:13:y:2021:i:1/2:p:72-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=114669
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injdan:v:13:y:2021:i:1/2:p:72-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=282 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.