IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injdan/v13y2021i1-2p59-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sentiment classification of review data using sentence significance score optimisation

Author

Listed:
  • Ketan Kumar Todi
  • S.N. Muralikrishna
  • B. Ashwath Rao

Abstract

A significant amount of work has been done in the field of sentiment analysis in textual data using the concepts and techniques of natural language processing (NLP). In this work, unlike the existing techniques, we present a novel method wherein we consider the significance of the sentences in formulating the opinion. Often in any review, the sentences in the review may correspond to different aspects which are often irrelevant in deciding whether the sentiment is positive or negative on a topic. Thus, we assign a sentence significance score to evaluate the overall sentiment of the review. We employ a clustering mechanism followed by the neural network approach to determine the optimal significance score for the review. The proposed supervised method shows a higher accuracy than the state-of-the-art techniques. We further determine the subjectivity of sentences and establish a relationship between subjectivity of sentences and the significance score. We experimentally show that the significance scores found in the proposed method correspond to identifying the subjective sentences and objective sentences in reviews. The sentences with low significance score corresponds to objective sentences and the sentences with high significance score corresponds to subjective sentences.

Suggested Citation

  • Ketan Kumar Todi & S.N. Muralikrishna & B. Ashwath Rao, 2021. "Sentiment classification of review data using sentence significance score optimisation," International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(1/2), pages 59-71.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injdan:v:13:y:2021:i:1/2:p:59-71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=114670
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injdan:v:13:y:2021:i:1/2:p:59-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=282 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.