IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injbaf/v10y2019i1p101-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pricing 'partial-average' Asian options with the binomial method

Author

Listed:
  • Erwinna Chendra
  • Kuntjoro Adji Sidarto
  • Muhammad Syamsuddin
  • Dila Puspita

Abstract

An Asian option is path-dependent derivatives whose payoff depends on the average of the underlying asset price over a certain pre-specified period of time. There is no simple closed-form solution for arithmetic Asian option hence the development of efficient and accurate numerical methods has become critical. In this paper, a modified binomial method is presented for pricing a more common arithmetic Asian option, by averaging the asset between two time periods in the life span of the option. This option is called the 'partial-average' Asian option. Subsequently, the representative averages are used instead of the actual ones for pricing the option. The set of representative averages is constructed first by determining the maximum and the minimum averages, where other averages are calculated by dividing equally the distance between the maximum and the minimum averages. For Asian option with average strike, if the distance between two time periods is widened by shifting the second time period to the right then the price becomes lower. But if the distance is widened by shifting the first time period to the left then the price becomes higher. The algorithm is not only simple but also easy to implement.

Suggested Citation

  • Erwinna Chendra & Kuntjoro Adji Sidarto & Muhammad Syamsuddin & Dila Puspita, 2019. "Pricing 'partial-average' Asian options with the binomial method," International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 101-116.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injbaf:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:101-116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=99311
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injbaf:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:101-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=277 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.