IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injams/v4y2012i4p407-424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating purchasing decisions via benefits of socially responsible purchasing

Author

Listed:
  • Sezi Çevik Onar

Abstract

In the globalised world, sustainability of companies depends not only on financial attributes but also companies' contribution to the welfare of society. Purchasing activities have a crucial role in this sustainability. The improvement in purchasing activities can increase company performance. We believe that managers can make better decisions when they know the aspects and benefits of socially responsible purchasing (SRP). Despite the growing impact of corporate social responsibility on business, it has had little impact on managerial decision. This study will fill the need of an overview of business benefits to measure and evaluate purchasing activities. As a result the motivation of this study is to clarify business benefits of SRP and to develop a model for evaluating purchasing decisions via business benefits of SRP which will support managers in their decision-making processes. In the introduction the motivations behind social responsible purchasing is defined. In the second part the business benefits of SRP is explained. In the third section a model for evaluating purchasing decisions via concrete business benefits of SRP is developed. This model is applied to a company in the copier industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Sezi Çevik Onar, 2012. "Evaluating purchasing decisions via benefits of socially responsible purchasing," International Journal of Applied Management Science, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(4), pages 407-424.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injams:v:4:y:2012:i:4:p:407-424
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=49927
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injams:v:4:y:2012:i:4:p:407-424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=286 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.