IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injams/v4y2012i4p371-384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A fuzzy integrated approach for the selection of academic papers to a special issue

Author

Listed:
  • Hulya Behret
  • Cigdem Altin Gumussoy

Abstract

The paper evaluation for a special issue is a lengthy process, which requires the collective collaboration of authors, reviewers and editors. In the first step, the evaluation criteria specific to each journal are determined by the editorial board and then reviewers make judgements whether to accept or reject the submitted manuscript by considering the previously determined evaluation criteria. The last decision of the submitted paper is given by the editor of this special issue by considering the reviewers' evaluations. The purpose of this study is to propose a systematic approach for the selection of academic papers to a special issue. This approach integrates fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) with fuzzy multi-criteria scoring method (FMSM). The results of the FAHP imply that, through the academic paper evaluation process, the most important criteria are originality of the subject and the methodology proposed in the research study. After these criteria, discussion and conclusions and data analysis have higher importance weights than the other criteria as language, abstract and keywords, literature review and format of the paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Hulya Behret & Cigdem Altin Gumussoy, 2012. "A fuzzy integrated approach for the selection of academic papers to a special issue," International Journal of Applied Management Science, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(4), pages 371-384.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injams:v:4:y:2012:i:4:p:371-384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=49925
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhongyi Wang & Keying Wang & Jiyue Liu & Jing Huang & Haihua Chen, 2022. "Measuring the innovation of method knowledge elements in scientific literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(5), pages 2803-2827, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injams:v:4:y:2012:i:4:p:371-384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=286 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.