IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injams/v18y2026i3p334-354.html

Does adhocracy culture enhance employee engagement and facilitate OCB? A mediation analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Kamaleswar Boro
  • Fariza Saidin
  • Pulak Kumar Deka
  • Bijit Debbarma

Abstract

The study highlights the mediating role of adhocracy culture in the nexus between employee engagement and organisational citizenship behaviour. Past studies on organisational culture have not emphasised specifically, on the influence of adhocracy culture across organisations and its impact on facilitating employee engagement and organisational citizenship behaviour. Data was collected from 219 employees of private firms across Guwahati, Assam. Partial Least Square based structured equation modelling was performed with the data to examine the relationship between the variables. As per the findings, adhocracy culture facilitates employee engagement and organisational citizenship behaviour but has an inverse relationship with employee engagement. Adhocracy culture was also found to be significant in mediating the relationship between organisational citizenship behaviour and employee engagement. As direct influence of OCB and EE was confirmed through path analysis, the strength of mediation of adhocracy culture was found to be small. Additionally, moderating effect of years of experience and gender was found to be insignificant. The study findings provide practical implication on firms and management, in terms of implementing adhocracy culture across their organisational culture.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamaleswar Boro & Fariza Saidin & Pulak Kumar Deka & Bijit Debbarma, 2026. "Does adhocracy culture enhance employee engagement and facilitate OCB? A mediation analysis," International Journal of Applied Management Science, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(3), pages 334-354.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injams:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:334-354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=155392
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injams:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:334-354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=286 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.