IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injams/v14y2022i4p299-315.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extreme value modelling of the South African Industrial Index (J520) returns using the generalised extreme value distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Owen Jakata
  • Delson Chikobvu

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyse the behaviour of extreme returns of the South African Industrial Index (J520) (years 1995-2018) and estimate extreme risk measures using the Generalised Extreme Value Distribution (GEVD). The results reveal that for the 8, 20 and 40 quarterly return periods, the estimated extreme losses are 9.28%, 13.65% and 17.03%, respectively. The extreme possible gains for the same periods are 9.81%, 11.63% and 12.68%, respectively. Therefore, in the short term (8 quarters) the extreme losses are less than the extreme gains, but in the medium to long term (20 and 40 quarterly return periods), the extreme losses are greater than the extreme gains. This study uses the GEVD to build models that can be used to estimate extreme risk measures that can act as effective decision-making tools for minimising risk exposure and maximising on the potential gains in equity portfolio risk management. Highlights: (1) In the short term the gains in the South African Industrial Index are greater than the losses. (2) However, in the medium to long term, for an investor invested in the same Index, the losses are greater than the gains.

Suggested Citation

  • Owen Jakata & Delson Chikobvu, 2022. "Extreme value modelling of the South African Industrial Index (J520) returns using the generalised extreme value distribution," International Journal of Applied Management Science, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(4), pages 299-315.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:injams:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:299-315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=127009
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injams:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:299-315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=286 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.