IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injams/v11y2019i2p91-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of customer satisfaction: empirical study in hotels

Author

Listed:
  • Maria João Cardoso Vieira Machado

Abstract

This study has three specific objectives, formulated based on the expectation confirmation paradigm: to analyse the hotel features, the performance evaluation tools used, and the price practiced by the hotels all as determinants of customer satisfaction. Data collection began with the conduction of a survey to the financial managers of 4 and 5-star hotels, located in Portugal, in order to collect information on the performance evaluation tools used and on certain hotel features. We obtained 241 fully completed inquiries. To meet the objectives proposed, two additional types of data were also collected: the degree of customer satisfaction, for the hotels responding to the initial survey (for this we used two different online platforms); the price charged by the responding hotels, using the online platform Booking.com. The results obtained lead us to the following main contributions: the validation of the expectation confirmation paradigm, namely by demonstrating that hotel features can be considered as factors affecting customer expectations, and that the performance evaluation tools can be considered as factors affecting the actual experience; the demonstration that there is an association between the price charged by the hotels and their customers' satisfaction, but in a way contrary to the theoretical assumptions of the expectation confirmation paradigm.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria João Cardoso Vieira Machado, 2019. "Determinants of customer satisfaction: empirical study in hotels," International Journal of Applied Management Science, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(2), pages 91-112.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injams:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:91-112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=98823
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injams:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:91-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=286 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.