IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injams/v11y2019i2p153-170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of perceived organisational support and organisational citizenship behaviour on turnover intention: an empirical investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Rezaei

Abstract

This study examines the relationships between perceived organisational support (POS), organisational citizenship behaviour (OCB) and turnover intentions; and the mediating role of OCB on perceived organisational support and turnover intentions. The population under study was all experts from the National Iranian Drilling Company as an empirical case study. Finally, 140 questionnaires were analysed based on structural equation modelling using SMART PLS software. Results showed that there is a significant positive relationship between perceived organisational support and organisational citizenship behaviour. Also, there is a negative significant relationship between perceived organisational support and turnover intention. The meditating role of OCB is supported in relation to the perceived organisational support and turnover intention.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Rezaei, 2019. "The impact of perceived organisational support and organisational citizenship behaviour on turnover intention: an empirical investigation," International Journal of Applied Management Science, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(2), pages 153-170.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injams:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:153-170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=98822
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injams:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:153-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=286 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.