Why sustain fundamental research?
There is no way to measuring the pay-off of basic research activities and the reasons that lead countries to spend a part of their R&D budget in this field may appear as ideological rather than bearing the stamp of economic common sense. Still, in spite of our time of privatisation, liberalisation, less State intervention, there are good reasons for such public investments. However, in spite of the progress achieved by science indicators, economic thinking and the policy-making experience, nobody knows how much should be devoted specifically to this part of the R&D system. As Benoit Godin has said for the R&D statistics, the pattern of policy-making in the support of basic research is both origin and result of 'intuitions more or less justified' â€“ one more proof that it is not because policy-making deals with science that it is more scientific or more rational than in other fields of political decisions. Still, the study of the means to improve the evaluation process of researchers and institutions within Europe deserves urgently to be undertaken.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 1 (2007)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=240|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijtlid:v:1:y:2007:i:2:p:125-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Graham Langley)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.