IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijtlid/v15y2023i2p115-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study on organisational trust, citizenship behaviour, and knowledge sharing: evidence from hotels in Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Thi Giang Le
  • Nhu Quynh Le Thi
  • Hoang Phung Nguyen Bach
  • Nam Tien Duong

Abstract

This study focuses on the correlation between organisational trust, organisational citizenship behaviour, and knowledge sharing (KS) among employees in Vietnam's international hotels. Convenient sampling was used to collect data through questionnaires. Their direct supervisors were asked to assist in pairing them in a 1:5 ratio for the assessment of their organisational citizenship behaviour. With a sample of 537 valid questionnaires, the study found that organisational trust has a significant positive impact on organisational citizenship behaviour and knowledge sharing behaviour. Organisational citizenship behaviour has a significant positive impact on knowledge sharing. Organisational citizenship behaviour also acts as a mediator between organisational trust and knowledge sharing (the intention and the actual behaviour of sharing). The findings of this study will help international hotels understand the importance of organisational trust and provide a basis for improving organisational citizenship behaviour and knowledge sharing, ultimately leading to improved revenue and performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Thi Giang Le & Nhu Quynh Le Thi & Hoang Phung Nguyen Bach & Nam Tien Duong, 2023. "A study on organisational trust, citizenship behaviour, and knowledge sharing: evidence from hotels in Vietnam," International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(2), pages 115-136.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijtlid:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:115-136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=135338
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijtlid:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:115-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=240 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.