IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijtlid/v10y2018i3-4p347-365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards an agenda for measuring innovation in emerging African economies: what can we learn from the case of South Africa?

Author

Listed:
  • Glenda Kruss

Abstract

Scholars have warned of the risks for designing relevant and effective policy instruments in emerging economies, based on indicators that do not measure the full complexity of innovation and technological upgrading in heterogenous contexts. There is growing consensus around the need to better align what is measured, with what should be measured. The paper reflects conceptually, using the case of South Africa, a middle-income country to propose a high-level framework, as a contribution to inform the adaptation of existing, and the creation of new complementary measures in low- and middle-income African contexts. Such a measurement approach should be based on broader models of innovation that emphasise the systemic and dynamic nature of innovation; that are oriented not only to firms and the formal sector, but also to other economic and social actors in informal settings; that encompass multiple dimensions of technology upgrading; and that focus on technological capability building, particularly at the local level.

Suggested Citation

  • Glenda Kruss, 2018. "Towards an agenda for measuring innovation in emerging African economies: what can we learn from the case of South Africa?," International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(3/4), pages 347-365.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijtlid:v:10:y:2018:i:3/4:p:347-365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=93722
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijtlid:v:10:y:2018:i:3/4:p:347-365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=240 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.