IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsuse/v5y2013i4p385-403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market competition and social welfare analysis for E10 and E85 with a game theory model

Author

Listed:
  • Minwen Yang
  • Guiping Hu

Abstract

With the increasing concerns about the petroleum reserve, and the global warming, people have been looking for renewable and environmental friendly energy sources to supplement and replace fossil fuels. Ethanol has been an appropriate substitute to fossil fuels. Currently, E10 and E85 are two of the main transportation fuels with ethanol and they are competing in the market. This study investigates the competition between E10 and E85 with an oligopoly Cournot model and derives three indicators from the equilibrium to measure the performance of the market: E85's market share, E85 price premium which indicate the consumers' additional willingness to pay, and the social welfare which indicates the societal wellbeing from the products. The authors also studied how the government policies impact the market equilibrium, how the industry size affects the market performance of E85, and whether E85 has a bright prospect with the increase of FFVs number. The results not only provide some prospects of E85, but also benefit the policy makers by quantitatively showing the effectiveness of tax credits and other government policies to promote the ethanol industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Minwen Yang & Guiping Hu, 2013. "Market competition and social welfare analysis for E10 and E85 with a game theory model," International Journal of Sustainable Economy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(4), pages 385-403.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsuse:v:5:y:2013:i:4:p:385-403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=56791
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsuse:v:5:y:2013:i:4:p:385-403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=301 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.