IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsuse/v18y2026i3p299-322.html

Impact of income inequality on environmental quality: the role of urbanisation and government behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Siyuan Liu
  • Saifuzzaman Ibrahim
  • Lee Chin

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the impact of income inequality on environmental quality. Furthermore, the study focuses on the moderating influence of urbanisation and government behaviour in this relationship. The study collects data from 142 countries between 2010 and 2019 and then experimentally analyses it using the generalised method of moments (GMM). The findings provide three significant insights. First, exacerbating income inequality will lead to a decline in environmental quality. Second, there is a significant moderating effect of both urbanisation and government behaviour. Additionally, the results of the heterogeneity analysis show that only in high-income countries does income inequality significantly decrease environmental quality. Based on these findings, the government should consider the issue of income inequality when formulating environmental protection policies. Specifically, the government can promote income equity through tax policies and redistribution systems, thereby effectively improving environmental quality. In addition, the government should strengthen the planning and management of the urbanisation process and mitigate the negative impact of income inequality on environmental quality through reasonable government behaviours.

Suggested Citation

  • Siyuan Liu & Saifuzzaman Ibrahim & Lee Chin, 2026. "Impact of income inequality on environmental quality: the role of urbanisation and government behaviour," International Journal of Sustainable Economy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(3), pages 299-322.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsuse:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:299-322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=154784
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsuse:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:299-322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=301 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.