IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsusd/v4y2001i3p304-320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional learning within the WTO regime: an evolutionary perspective on the trade—environment dispute

Author

Listed:
  • Dorothee Becker Soest
  • Ruediger Wink

Abstract

The assessment of interactions between trade and the environment is dominated by intensive ideological and scientific controversies. These controversies also influence the development of international rules for trade within the GATT/WTO regime. Despite recognition of the need for accepted institutional rules, only slow institutional changes can be observed. The connection of environmental protection with protectionist measures favouring old industrial and agricultural sectors makes it especially difficult to define accepted and objectiflable criteria for justifiable trade interventions. This paper analyses the incentives within the GATT/WTO regime to use institutional experiences for learning processes and institutional reforms. By using an interdisciplinary methodology of evolutionary economics and political science, new procedural criteria to identify learning efforts are developed. These criteria offer opportunities to show the reform potential within and outside the international trade system to overcome common misunderstandings and controversies.

Suggested Citation

  • Dorothee Becker Soest & Ruediger Wink, 2001. "Institutional learning within the WTO regime: an evolutionary perspective on the trade—environment dispute," International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(3), pages 304-320.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsusd:v:4:y:2001:i:3:p:304-320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=4444
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsusd:v:4:y:2001:i:3:p:304-320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=25 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.