IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsusd/v16y2013i1-2p23-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Technolife project: an experimental approach to new ethical frameworks for emerging science and technology

Author

Listed:
  • Kjetil Rommetveit
  • Kristrun Gunnarsdóttir
  • Kim Sune Jepsen
  • Thora Margareta Bertilsson
  • Fanny Verrax
  • Roger Strand

Abstract

Science and technology evolve fast both as a result of their internal dynamics and the increased emphasis on research and innovation in the so-called knowledge economy. Due attention to ethical issues and aspects of emerging science and technology is called for. This paper presents the development of an experimental methodology for empirical and participatory ethics of science and technology designed to detect, understand and mediate public concerns. The experimental approach of Technolife seeks for points of mediation by which varied public concerns can become embedded institutionally and secure sets of legitimate procedures. It is an open (experimental) question if the wide variety of technologies now in sway can be handled within a uniform ethical framework or if such ethical frameworks also need to evolve more sensitised to diverse technological challenges. Thus, our methodological approach is experimental in yet a further manner in that we seek to mediate between lay ethics, whether actually existent or else merely potential, and the discourse of professional ethicists, recognising the fragmented character of both layers. The methodology forms a central part of the European Union FP7-supported, ongoing (2010) project Technolife, which gives social and sociotechnical imaginaries a key role in the ethical framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Kjetil Rommetveit & Kristrun Gunnarsdóttir & Kim Sune Jepsen & Thora Margareta Bertilsson & Fanny Verrax & Roger Strand, 2013. "The Technolife project: an experimental approach to new ethical frameworks for emerging science and technology," International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(1/2), pages 23-45.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsusd:v:16:y:2013:i:1/2:p:23-45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=53789
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsusd:v:16:y:2013:i:1/2:p:23-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=25 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.