IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v8y2011i4p471-486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining improvement priorities of public leisure facilities by revised Importance–Performance Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Hui-Hsien Hsu
  • Chi-Fan Lin
  • Yi-De Liu

Abstract

The aim of this research is to use a revised Importance–Performance Analysis (IPA) approach that comprises three-factor theory concept and partial correlation analysis for classifying public leisure services into factors so that managers can make better decisions about how resources should be allocated to improve service quality. On the basis of the customer survey of 90,746 respondents collected from 254 public leisure centres in England during the period of 2006-2008, the research findings demonstrate that the performance of English public leisure facilities in technical quality (facility and service quality) is generally worse than functional quality (accessibility and staff). Specifically, adequate resources have to be allocated to improve the service in water temperature and number of people in swimming pool, not only because they are the major weaknesses but also because customers regard them as prerequisites. To sum up, managers need to know which factor service attributes fall so as to set right priorities while managing customer satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui-Hsien Hsu & Chi-Fan Lin & Yi-De Liu, 2011. "Determining improvement priorities of public leisure facilities by revised Importance–Performance Analysis," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(4), pages 471-486.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:8:y:2011:i:4:p:471-486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=39665
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:8:y:2011:i:4:p:471-486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.