IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v43y2022i4p550-561.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designing an optimal plant layout: a case of the plastic moulding company

Author

Listed:
  • Hokey Min
  • Seong-Jong Joo

Abstract

The generation of viable layout alternatives is a critical step in production planning since the chosen layout affects the efficiency of utilising the firm's key resources such as space, equipment, materials, utility and workers. As such, it can dictate the firm's productivity and the subsequent profitability. In addition, it can influence the safety and security of plants. Considering the important role of a plant layout in production planning, a small-to-medium enterprise (SME) that produces customised plastic moulding products begins to explore the better layout alternatives than the existing one that has become the sources of production bottlenecks, shipping delays, cycle counting errors and space crunches. Such alternatives include an L-shape, a straight line and a U-shape. To determine the optimal layout among three layout alternatives, we propose systematic decision-aid tools comprised of a mathematical model, computer-aided design (CAD), an activity relationship chart and a from-to-chart. We validated the usefulness and practicality of these hybrid tools for the plant layout by applying them to the real world problem encountering the plastic moulding company in the USA. Based on our proven success through the case study, other manufacturing firms can replicate the proposed tools for other layout challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Hokey Min & Seong-Jong Joo, 2022. "Designing an optimal plant layout: a case of the plastic moulding company," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 43(4), pages 550-561.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:43:y:2022:i:4:p:550-561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=127467
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:43:y:2022:i:4:p:550-561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.