IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v42y2022i4p525-538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gap between expectation and perception of customers about e-banking services for each service quality dimensions in selected public and private sector banks in India

Author

Listed:
  • Mahesh Chand Garg
  • Parveen Kumar

Abstract

This paper analysed the gap between expectation and perception of customers about e-banking services for each service quality dimensions in selected public and private sector banks in India. For this study, a sample of top ten public and top ten private scheduled commercial banks has been taken from three selected cities of National Capital Region of India. A sample size of 600 customers selected taking ten customers from each bank by using non-probability convenience sampling through well-structured questionnaire and 578 questionnaires were used in final analysis. Service quality model (SERVQUAL) was used for analysing the gap between expectation and perception of customers about e-banking service. The study found that service quality in e-banking system of selected public banks for six dimensions (tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, empathy, efficiency and privacy) was better in comparison to selected private banks. For assurance aspect, private banks had higher service quality in comparison to public sector banks.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahesh Chand Garg & Parveen Kumar, 2022. "Gap between expectation and perception of customers about e-banking services for each service quality dimensions in selected public and private sector banks in India," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 42(4), pages 525-538.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:42:y:2022:i:4:p:525-538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=125026
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:42:y:2022:i:4:p:525-538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.