IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v42y2022i4p500-524.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Buffer size evaluation in a bottle plant production system: a comparison between different solving methods

Author

Listed:
  • Ilenia Zennaro
  • Serena Finco
  • Riccardo Aldrighetti
  • Daria Battini

Abstract

The buffer allocation problem (BAP) is a crucial research issue in designing manufacturing systems. Several methods have been proposed including simulation modelling, exact and heuristics approaches. Simulation is usually time-consuming and requires expensive software; analytical approaches necessitate specific knowledge that is uncommon in companies, especially among small-medium enterprises (SMEs). Thus, practitioners generally develop empirical methods based on their experience, to get buffers size with easy-to-use procedures. This paper proposes a comparison between three BAP approaches: an empirical method, a simulation method, and an experimental formula, all applied in a real case study. Simulation approach leads to a great optimal solution, but it requires to buy the software and time to build the model. The empirical method requires a shorter time but the buffer size results in severe additional costs. Finally, the experimental formula proves to be a good trade-off between the obtained buffer size and the efforts addressed its application.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilenia Zennaro & Serena Finco & Riccardo Aldrighetti & Daria Battini, 2022. "Buffer size evaluation in a bottle plant production system: a comparison between different solving methods," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 42(4), pages 500-524.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:42:y:2022:i:4:p:500-524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=124990
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:42:y:2022:i:4:p:500-524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.