IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v42y2022i3p353-378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ranking model for human seating comfort factors in automobiles: a best worst approach

Author

Listed:
  • Talhah Shamshad Ansari
  • Noor Zaman Khan
  • Annayath Maqbool
  • Zahid A. Khan
  • Rajesh Attri

Abstract

Comfortable seating in an automobile has become a necessity for travellers, rather than a luxury. Seating comfort is essentially important for the health and safety of the automobile occupants. Several factors influence human seating comfort and therefore, this paper identifies them through comprehensive literature survey and experts' opinion. Thirty-two such factors are identified and they are categorised into five main categories. Subsequently, optimal weights of these factors are computed using a novel multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) method, i.e., the best-worst method (BWM) based on which they are ranked so as to establish their importance concerning human seating comfort. Further, sensitivity analysis is carried out to ensure the robustness of the ranking results. This study is expected to assist design engineers and researchers in understanding the importance of the factors affecting human seating comfort in automobiles so that they can tackle them strategically to provide the desired seating comfort to the occupants.

Suggested Citation

  • Talhah Shamshad Ansari & Noor Zaman Khan & Annayath Maqbool & Zahid A. Khan & Rajesh Attri, 2022. "Ranking model for human seating comfort factors in automobiles: a best worst approach," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 42(3), pages 353-378.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:42:y:2022:i:3:p:353-378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=124276
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:42:y:2022:i:3:p:353-378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.