IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v41y2022i1-2p203-223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using time motion study to identify the determinants of patient satisfaction and impact of long appointment wait time: an empirical case of radiology department

Author

Listed:
  • Amandeep Dhaliwal

Abstract

Long waiting time is an annoyance to the patients and it leads to negative perception of service provider. The study examined the determinants of patient satisfaction index with imaging services being provided by the healthcare provider with an emphasis on the waiting time and service time and overall average waiting time for the patients in radiology department. A cross-sectional time study was conducted using single blind observance of patients who visited the radiology department. Further, root cause analysis (RCA) of the factors leading to longer wait time was undertaken. The results revealed that longer waiting time was negatively associated with patient satisfaction regarding several aspects of the care they received. It is not always possible to prevent dissatisfaction with waiting times by increasing resources such as increasing staffing. However, corrective and preventive action (CAPA)-based best practices and recommendations are outlined to ensure lesser waiting time and higher patient satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Amandeep Dhaliwal, 2022. "Using time motion study to identify the determinants of patient satisfaction and impact of long appointment wait time: an empirical case of radiology department," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 41(1/2), pages 203-223.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:41:y:2022:i:1/2:p:203-223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=121691
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:41:y:2022:i:1/2:p:203-223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.