IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v38y2021i3p379-394.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A novel multi-objective mathematical model for designing a strategy map with goal programming approach

Author

Listed:
  • Meghdad Haji Mohammad Ali Jahromi

Abstract

The advantage of the balances scorecard (BSC) is that it considers financial and non-financial aspects simultaneously so that each of them has corresponding indicators and each indicator supported with one or more initiative(s). Selecting identified objectives in light of the importance by considering organisational constraints (i.e., resources) are important, as well as determining cause and effect relationships between them in different aspects. The purpose of this paper is to select strategic objectives from identified potential strategic objectives and selecting the important relationships between them. This paper presents a goal programming approach to model building strategy map. This model contains three goals, these goals related to relative importance of strategic objectives (G1), number of casual relationships (G2) and relative importance of relationships (G3). Finally, by solving a problem as a real case of a business company with different targets and different weight for objectives, the performance of the developed model has been examined. Results represent the model's efficiency in presenting a suitable strategy map according to the decision makers' want and organisational constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Meghdad Haji Mohammad Ali Jahromi, 2021. "A novel multi-objective mathematical model for designing a strategy map with goal programming approach," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 38(3), pages 379-394.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:38:y:2021:i:3:p:379-394
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=113602
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:38:y:2021:i:3:p:379-394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.