IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v38y2021i2p161-187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accuracy in measuring customer satisfaction

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Madzík
  • Miroslav Hrnčiar

Abstract

The study reports an analysis of the accuracy of three selected methods - point direct scoring (PDS), ranking (RK) and multi-choice (MCh) - in processing the results of large-scale surveys. The reference value for assessing their accuracy was the degree of overall satisfaction. We adopted a structured approach: first a reference value was selected against which to assess accuracy. The next step was determination of the methods for calculating the comparison value. After the calculation was made, the values calculated using each method were compared to the reference value and the resulting data were used to determine the accuracy of the given method. The RK method had a statistically significant advantage over the PDS and MCh methods in the accuracy of its relationship to the reference value. It was calculated that the RK method was on average 7.8% more accurate than the PDS and MCh methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Madzík & Miroslav Hrnčiar, 2021. "Accuracy in measuring customer satisfaction," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 38(2), pages 161-187.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:38:y:2021:i:2:p:161-187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=113025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:38:y:2021:i:2:p:161-187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.