IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v35y2020i4p504-527.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply chain risk management and the role of project managers: a comparative analysis of US and Japanese firms

Author

Listed:
  • Takashi Shimizu
  • Kihyun Park
  • Youngwon Park
  • Mark H. Haney

Abstract

In today's tremendously uncertain business environment, business firms are faced with a wide variety of risks, and risk management is now widely accepted as an important tool in the management of businesses and projects. However, research suggests that there may be differences in the ways that risks are perceived and managed in different cultures. This paper contributes to our understanding of risk management across cultures through the analysis of a risk-management survey administered to firms in both Japan and the USA. The analysis compares risk management practices of Japanese and US firms. Specifically, this paper investigates the patterns of product risk management utilised by US and Japanese firms and discusses possible causes of their differences and how the differences affect firm behaviour. Key findings include that 1) US firms have relatively weak risk management systems compared to their Japanese counterparts; 2) US firms using both project managers and quality management departments for risk management are proactive in their risk management; 3) those firms using only project managers for risk management are reluctant to expand or renew their risk management systems. Possible causes of these differences and how the differences affect firm behaviour are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Takashi Shimizu & Kihyun Park & Youngwon Park & Mark H. Haney, 2020. "Supply chain risk management and the role of project managers: a comparative analysis of US and Japanese firms," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 35(4), pages 504-527.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:35:y:2020:i:4:p:504-527
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=105912
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:35:y:2020:i:4:p:504-527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.