IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v30y2018i1p72-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysing NEH and a few other similar permutation flow shop scheduling heuristics using Taillard's and Vallada's benchmarking problems

Author

Listed:
  • A. Baskar

Abstract

This paper analyses the performance of the NEH and five more similar heuristics proposed by the author using Taillard benchmark problems (120 in numbers) proposed in 1993 and new hard benchmarks (480 in numbers) proposed by Vallada et al. (2015). Two more initial orderings of jobs are considered besides the original, which orders the jobs in non-increasing order of the total processing times. The first one is according to non-increasing order of average processing time and standard deviation of their processing times proposed by Dong et al. (2008) and the other one is pertinent to non-increasing order of average processing time, average machine idle time and the standard deviation of their processing times. The performance of various heuristics and different ordering of jobs are also analysed using real time data collected from a plant manufacturing cold drawn seamless (CDS) tubes. The results indicate that two heuristics proposed by the author perform slightly better than NEH.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Baskar, 2018. "Analysing NEH and a few other similar permutation flow shop scheduling heuristics using Taillard's and Vallada's benchmarking problems," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 30(1), pages 72-97.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:30:y:2018:i:1:p:72-97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=91440
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:30:y:2018:i:1:p:72-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.