IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v27y2017i4p457-471.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ten most common indicators in agreements involving profit sharing plans

Author

Listed:
  • Elpidio Oscar Benitez Nara
  • Victor Hugo Porto De Oliveira
  • Jacques Nelson Corleta Schreiber
  • João Carlos Furtado
  • Julio Cezar Mairesse Siluk
  • André Luiz Emmel Silva

Abstract

Approving the Brazilian law for profit sharing plans (PSP) has brought a new perspective to the society when it comes to capital and labour relations. Concerning PSP, Law number 12.832 from June 2013 rules the relationship between business companies and workers, together with labour unions, providing to both parties the possibility of negotiating improvements on organisational processes for the companies and better pay for the employees. The main goal of this study is to present the results of a research developed with the ten most common indicators in 232 PSP agreements signed in Brazil between 2013 and 2014. The information used in this research was obtained in websites and at the headquarters of labour unions and companies from the issued region. The contracts were tabulated and analysed. From all information acquired, it was possible to extract 22 different performance indicators and, through the information acquired, it was concluded that the ten indicators pointed out here strongly represent the group studied, since they mean 84.99% of all indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • Elpidio Oscar Benitez Nara & Victor Hugo Porto De Oliveira & Jacques Nelson Corleta Schreiber & João Carlos Furtado & Julio Cezar Mairesse Siluk & André Luiz Emmel Silva, 2017. "The ten most common indicators in agreements involving profit sharing plans," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 27(4), pages 457-471.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:27:y:2017:i:4:p:457-471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=85212
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:27:y:2017:i:4:p:457-471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.