IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v26y2017i4p498-526.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance appraisement and benchmarking of leagility inspired enterprises: a fuzzy-based decision making approach

Author

Listed:
  • Chhabi Ram Matawale
  • Saurav Datta
  • Siba Sankar Mahapatra

Abstract

Leagility is the combination of silent features of both lean and agile concept into existing supply chain strategy; their appropriate implementation has become the key success factor for modern business today. The main problem that arises in assessing leagility extent is due to subjectivity of evaluation indices (attributes/criteria). In order to avoid vagueness, incompleteness as well as inconsistency in subjective evaluation information; the leagile supply chain performance attributes have been evaluated in terms of fuzzy terminology. The 'degree of similarity' concept between two interval-valued fuzzy numbers (IVFNs) adapted from fuzzy set theory has been explored here for performance appraisement as well as benchmarking of leagile enterprises (alternatives). A case empirical study has been executed for selection of the best performed leagile organisation by using the proposed degree of similarity approach in conjugation with the concept of 'closeness coefficient' adapted from TOPSIS, a well-known decision-making tool.

Suggested Citation

  • Chhabi Ram Matawale & Saurav Datta & Siba Sankar Mahapatra, 2017. "Performance appraisement and benchmarking of leagility inspired enterprises: a fuzzy-based decision making approach," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 26(4), pages 498-526.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:26:y:2017:i:4:p:498-526
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=82895
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:26:y:2017:i:4:p:498-526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.