IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v26y2017i4p428-442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantification of agility level using fuzzy logic approach: a case study in a battery manufacturing organisation

Author

Listed:
  • C.V. Pooja
  • C.G. Sreenivasa

Abstract

In globalised market environment, it is inevitable for the manufacturing sectors to face competition. In order to face this competition, the manufacturing sectors need to imbibe agile manufacturing (AM) paradigm. However, these manufacturing sectors may be practicing AM paradigm at slower/higher pace. In order to identify the pace at which AM paradigm is practiced, agility level of these companies has to be assessed. In this background, the scope of this paper is to carryout agility assessment using fuzzy logic approach. This is due to the reason that, fuzzy logic uses linguistic variables for assessment. The agility assessment covers thirty criteria reported by the previous researchers in the literature. The case study has been carried out in a battery manufacturing company. Initially agility index from this company was gathered and analysed. Subsequently, weak criteria prevailing in the case company has been identified. Further, proposals were derived to strengthen these weak AM criteria. Overall, the process of applying fuzzy logic for agility assessment has been explained with a case study in this paper.

Suggested Citation

  • C.V. Pooja & C.G. Sreenivasa, 2017. "Quantification of agility level using fuzzy logic approach: a case study in a battery manufacturing organisation," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 26(4), pages 428-442.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:26:y:2017:i:4:p:428-442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=82891
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:26:y:2017:i:4:p:428-442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.