IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v25y2016i1p48-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Redefining service quality scale with customer experience quality scale: a critical review

Author

Listed:
  • Atul Gupta

Abstract

Service quality was originally conceptualised as a gap between expectations and the consumer's overall assessment of the service encounter. Service quality's most popular measure is SERVQUAL. Although it has been widely applied, SERVQUAL was found to have several limitations as a measure of customer experience. One of these is that its dimensions appear too limited to fully capture customer experience. Defining and improving customer experience is a growing priority for market research because experience is replacing quality as the competitive battleground for marketing. Customer experience has been conceptualised as the customer's subjective response to the direct and indirect encounter with the company. Experience quality is defined as the perceived excellence or superiority of the holistic encounter. Proposed study review gaps and limitations in SERVQUAL scale of service quality to redefine it with customer experience quality and review current literature on experience quality and its relationship with customer satisfaction, loyalty and word of mouth. No scale is widely accepted in the area of customer experience quality compared to widely used SERVQUAL scale. But scope of future research is there to develop more comprehensive and widely accepted scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Atul Gupta, 2016. "Redefining service quality scale with customer experience quality scale: a critical review," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 25(1), pages 48-64.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:25:y:2016:i:1:p:48-64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=78070
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:25:y:2016:i:1:p:48-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.