IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v21y2015i2p150-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A framework for service quality improvement in multi-stage processes

Author

Listed:
  • Sheila Roy
  • Indrajit Mukherjee

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to develop an integrative framework for identifying and prioritising process improvement opportunities in a multi-stage service operation with the objective of improving quality perception. The proposed framework identifies important perceptual elements in the process and links the abstract nature of service quality perception with the operational measures (e.g., delivery time) of actual process performance. The proposed framework looks beyond customer SQ perception scores and analyses the actual performance of the process alongside customer perception in a multi-stage service process. The framework recommends that the customer perception of service quality and process performance are to be measured and analysed simultaneously for any process improvements. The applicability of the framework is verified by using a real-life case on customer service request and the service delivery process. Ordinal logistic regression is used to determine the process improvement priorities. The case study findings provide evidence and critical insight into the linkage of customer perception of service quality with operational measures of actual process performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheila Roy & Indrajit Mukherjee, 2015. "A framework for service quality improvement in multi-stage processes," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(2), pages 150-174.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:21:y:2015:i:2:p:150-174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=69380
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:21:y:2015:i:2:p:150-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.