IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v19y2014i1p29-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial state of affairs for NCAA sports: a case for intangible strategic assets?

Author

Listed:
  • Amber A. Smith
  • David P. Synowka

Abstract

Traditionally, the practitioner literature gives significant account of how well NCAA-member organisations carries out its mission, but rarely is fiscal responsibility discussed as one of them. Although professional sport leagues are for-profit organisations and have traditionally relied on innovations to attract and hold its fan base and create new streams of potential revenue, it seems that the NCAA has lost its control on spiraling costs and has few solutions to its relatively flat sources of revenue. As outlined by recent financial reports, especially by Fulks (2012), all NCAA subdivisions experienced relatively few revenue sources. The three that accounted for 50% or more of the total generated revenues were ticket sales, alumni and booster contributions, and NCAA and conference distributions. The lack of fiscal sustainability in a world where few institutions are getting the most of available NCAA-related athletic activities profits from their sport-related activities, coupled with relatively flat revenue growth and increasing expenses, a real signal to management of educational institutions that better fiscal management must be put into place. Most financial reporting makes the entire concept of a self-supporting NCAA athletic organisation unsustainable from a financial standpoint. However, these financial reports do not include the contributions from intangible assets.

Suggested Citation

  • Amber A. Smith & David P. Synowka, 2014. "Financial state of affairs for NCAA sports: a case for intangible strategic assets?," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(1), pages 29-48.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:19:y:2014:i:1:p:29-48
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=64033
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:19:y:2014:i:1:p:29-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.