IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v18y2014i2p212-232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Causality between liquidity management and profitability: evidence from Indian CPSEs

Author

Listed:
  • Bhaskar Bagchi

Abstract

This study comprehensively excavates the general relationship and causality between liquidity management and corporate profitability for Indian CPSEs (central public sector enterprises). Liquidity indices like current ratio, liquid ratio, absolute liquid ratio and cash conversion cycle are taken as explanatory variables, whereas, age of creditors, age of debtors, age of inventory and the natural logarithm of sales are taken as control variables. Profitability is measured in terms of return on total assets. The sample size is restricted to 48 Indian CPSEs listed on the National Stock Exchange (NSE) and Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) of India and the secondary data for analysis is retrieved from CMIE (Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy) for a ten-year period from 2002-2003 to 2011-2012. Statistical and econometric tools like, descriptive statistics, unit root test, fixed effects regression model and Granger causality test are employed in the study. Granger causality test suggests the evidence of feedback causality running between current ratio, liquid ratio, absolute liquid ratio and cash conversion cycle with return on total assets, while, unidirectional causality is found to be running from firms' size to return on total assets.

Suggested Citation

  • Bhaskar Bagchi, 2014. "Causality between liquidity management and profitability: evidence from Indian CPSEs," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(2), pages 212-232.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:18:y:2014:i:2:p:212-232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=62001
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:18:y:2014:i:2:p:212-232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.