IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v16y2013i1p123-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation and selection of flexible manufacturing systems using MACBETH method

Author

Listed:
  • Prasad Karande
  • Shankar Chakraborty

Abstract

Flexible manufacturing system (FMS) is a centrally controlled manufacturing unit consisting of numerically controlled machine tools and material handling equipment. Selection of an appropriate FMS is a complicated task as it involves huge capital investment. Due to tough competition in the globalised market, decisions regarding these investments become crucial for the survival of any manufacturing industry. Decision for selection of an FMS is observed to be based on numerous conflicting tangible and intangible criteria. In this paper, the application of measuring attractiveness by a categorical-based evaluation technique (MACBETH) is illustrated by solving two real time FMS selection problems. In this method, semantic scales are used for pair-wise comparison of performance of the alternatives and also to determine the criteria weights. Further, each category of semantic scales is converted to normalised quantitative values and ranking of FMS alternatives is obtained by the weighted mean method. Even though, MACBETH method is well known for qualitative performance measures, it is also capable to deal with quantitative performance measures. The derived FMS rankings are observed to be quite satisfactory and well acceptable to the decision makers.

Suggested Citation

  • Prasad Karande & Shankar Chakraborty, 2013. "Evaluation and selection of flexible manufacturing systems using MACBETH method," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(1), pages 123-144.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:16:y:2013:i:1:p:123-144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=55576
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:16:y:2013:i:1:p:123-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.